A Comparative Analysis of CGS, FPS (British), and MKS Systems

Throughout history, various systems of units have been developed to measure physical quantities. Among these, three prominent systems are the CGS (Centimeter-Gram-Second), FPS (Foot-Pound-Second), and MKS (Meter-Kilogram-Second) systems. Each system has its unique characteristics and historical significance. In this essay, we will explore the features, advantages, and limitations of the CGS, FPS, and MKS systems, comparing their structures and usage in different contexts.

1. CGS System:

The CGS system is a metric system based on centimeters (length), grams (mass), and seconds (time). It was introduced in the mid-19th century and became popular in scientific communities due to its simplicity and ease of calculations.

a) Length: The base unit of length in the CGS system is the centimeter (cm). One centimeter is equal to 1/100th of a meter, making it suitable for measuring small-scale dimensions, especially in laboratory experiments.

b) Mass: The base unit of mass in the CGS system is the gram (g). One gram is equivalent to 1/1000th of a kilogram. The CGS system is particularly well-suited for measuring masses of subatomic particles and other objects with low mass values.

c) Time: The base unit of time in the CGS system is the second (s), which remains consistent with the other systems.

Advantages of the CGS System:

i. Precision: The CGS system’s smaller base units allow for more precise measurements in scientific experiments, particularly in fields like physics, chemistry, and material sciences.

ii. Convenient for Small-Scale Measurements: Due to its centimeter and gram base units, the CGS system is ideal for measuring objects and quantities on a smaller scale.

iii. Simplified Equations: In certain scientific applications, the CGS system yields simpler equations, making calculations more straightforward.

Limitations of the CGS System:

i. Inconvenient for Macroscopic Measurements: The small size of CGS units can be inconvenient for measuring larger, macroscopic quantities, such as distances in astronomy or masses of large industrial objects.

ii. Lack of Commonality: The CGS system lacks a unified set of units for force, energy, and power, making it less consistent compared to other systems.

2. FPS (British) System:

The FPS system, also known as the British system, was widely used in the United Kingdom and the United States until the adoption of the International System of Units (SI). It is based on feet (length), pounds (mass), and seconds (time). The FPS system has its roots in ancient history and was heavily influenced by British traditions.

a) Length: The base unit of length in the FPS system is the foot (ft). One foot is approximately 0.3048 meters, and it was historically defined based on the length of the human foot.

b) Mass: The base unit of mass in the FPS system is the pound (lb). One pound is approximately 0.4536 kilograms.

c) Time: Similar to other systems, the second (s) serves as the base unit for time in the FPS system.

Advantages of the FPS System:

i. Familiarity: The FPS system was widely used in English-speaking countries, leading to familiarity among the population and industries.

ii. Convenient for Construction and Engineering: The use of feet and pounds in the FPS system was advantageous in construction and engineering fields, where these units were commonly employed.

iii. Established Historical Background: The FPS system has a rich historical background and was utilized for centuries before the adoption of the SI system.

Limitations of the FPS System:

i. Lack of Universality: The FPS system lacks the universality and consistency provided by the SI system, making it challenging to communicate and compare measurements internationally.

ii. Complexity in Scientific Applications: In scientific calculations, the FPS system can result in complex equations and conversions, which can be prone to errors.

3. MKS System:

The MKS system, also known as the International System of Units (SI), is the modern and globally accepted metric system used by the majority of countries worldwide. It is based on meters (length), kilograms (mass), and seconds (time). The MKS system was developed to address the limitations of older systems and provide a coherent and consistent framework for measurement.

a) Length: The base unit of length in the MKS system is the meter (m), which is defined as the distance traveled by light in a vacuum in 1/299,792,458 seconds.

b) Mass: The base unit of mass in the MKS system is the kilogram (kg), which is defined as the mass of the International Prototype of the Kilogram, a platinum-iridium cylinder kept at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) in France.

c) Time: The base unit of time in the MKS system remains consistent with other systems and is represented by the second (s).

Advantages of the MKS System:

i. Universality: The MKS system is universally accepted and provides a common language for scientific, industrial, and everyday measurements worldwide.

ii. Simplicity in Calculations: The MKS system’s base units are interconnected and easily convertible, simplifying mathematical calculations and unit conversions.

iii. Precision: The use of the meter and kilogram as base units allows for precise and accurate measurements across a wide range of applications.

Limitations of the MKS System:

i. Limited Precision for Small-Scale Measurements: While the MKS system is highly precise for most applications, it may not be ideal for measuring extremely small-scale quantities, where the CGS system might be more suitable.

ii. Initial Adoption Challenges: The transition from older systems to the MKS system required adjustments and acceptance from various industries and countries.


In conclusion, the CGS, FPS (British), and MKS systems represent three different approaches to units of measurement, each with its advantages and limitations. The CGS system, with its smaller base units, is suitable for precise scientific measurements on a smaller scale. The FPS system, rooted in historical traditions, was widely used in the English-speaking world and was particularly advantageous for engineering and construction applications. On the other hand, the MKS system, or SI system, is the most widely adopted and internationally recognized metric system, providing a coherent and universal framework for measurements across all scientific disciplines and industries. While the MKS system is the most comprehensive and accurate of the three, the historical context and unique features of the CGS and FPS systems have contributed to their significance in specific fields. The ongoing use and development of the SI system continue to shape the way we understand and quantify the physical world, providing a unified approach to measurements and promoting international cooperation in science and trade.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *